Ex. 12Blog
Writing from the Mary team.
28 Oct 2026Mary is now available in ClaudeWith connectors for both Claude and Harvey, Mary lets litigation teams keep one reviewed factual record of a matter, whichever AI tools they choose.
26 Oct 2026Who Decides What Counts as a Seven?eDiscovery today lets the party holding the records decide what a request means, apply that reading in a black box, and then certify the result with statistics built on the same reading.
19 Oct 2026How Mary Helps Family Lawyers in AustraliaAustralian family lawyers and the professionals alongside them report saving 70%+ of the time they spent on document review and disclosure with Mary.
9 Oct 2026Mastering Mass Torts with MaryMass Tort matters involve complex files across hundreds of plaintiffs. Mary makes the process of managing a docket substantially easier.
27 Sept 2026Cutting through chaos for boutique litigation Small litigation firms often carry the most complex matters. Mary helps them master the evidence and compete with much larger firms.
21 Sept 2026Helping Family Lawyers Overcome Fact ChaosFamily law attorneys and adjacent professionals using Mary report saving 70%+ of the time they used to spend on document review and discovery. - 9 Sept 2026Catherine Thompson Joins Mary to Lead Mary Legal in the USThompson joins from Blevans, Itzkowitz & Cantrell to own the standard Mary’s work must
meet before an American lawyer relies on it.
19 Aug 2026The factual record is becoming infrastructureAs legal AI gets better, the record underneath the work matters more.
16 Aug 2026When legal AI changes information you have already verifiedA new study shows legal AI can alter correct source information after retrieval, and why the system around the model changes the result.
13 Aug 2026Legal AI vendors should share the verification burdenLawyers remain accountable for the work they use. But vendors should be accountable for making that work practical to verify.
24 July 2026The Two Clocks, in LitigationThe capability clock is moving faster than the institutional one. In litigation, the gap is adversarial.
23 July 2026What Is the Factual Record of a Litigation Matter?A practical definition of the factual record in litigation, how it differs from documents and chronologies, and what it should preserve as a matter changes.
22 July 2026How to Test Legal AI on a Matter Your Firm Already KnowsA controlled way to test legal AI for source accuracy, material omissions, correction handling and the time required to reach usable work.
21 July 2026eDiscovery, DMS and the Factual Record: Which Does What?A practical map of the roles played by document management, eDiscovery, factual-record systems and drafting tools across a litigation matter.
20 July 2026What MCP Means for Legal AI and the Factual RecordWhat MCP clients and servers connect, and why legal context, permissions and a reviewed factual record still need to be designed.
19 July 2026The Perfect AI Is a Combination of Tools: A Litigation GuideA practical guide to matching legal research, eDiscovery, factual review and drafting tools to the task each performs best.
19 July 2026Webinar: AI in Litigation – Promise, Pitfalls and SanctionsRecap of our July 2026 panel with Seth Goldstein and Catherine Thompson on AI's value, verification risks and professional duties in litigation.- 18 July 2026When a Lawyer Corrects the AI, Where Does the Correction Go?A practical model for storing lawyer corrections as governed matter state rather than letting them disappear inside one AI conversation.
17 July 2026When the Record Is Incomplete, Legal AI Should Say SoHow legal AI should handle insufficient evidence, conflicting accounts, missing documents and unread material without producing a complete-looking answer.
16 July 2026When a Real Source Still Produces a Wrong Legal AI AnswerA practical taxonomy for legal AI errors that survive a basic source check, including misquotation, mischaracterisation, transformation and incomplete coverage.- 15 July 2026The Real ROI of Legal AI: Measure Time to Usable WorkA practical method for measuring legal AI ROI across generation, review, correction, omissions, implementation and reuse.
14 July 2026Legal AI Agent Permissions: Read, Propose and ActA practical permission model for legal AI agents, separating access to information from the authority to change a matter or act outside the firm.
12 July 2026AI for Commercial Litigation: Building the Factual RecordHow a persistent, source-linked factual record can support commercial litigation from early case assessment through discovery, witness preparation and hearing.
30 June 2026Getting Started (Safely): Six Tips for AttorneysA six-step framework for introducing generative AI: approved tools, client data, closed-matter testing, source checks and human accountability.
18 June 2026The 7 Deadly Sins in Family LawEmily Lonsdale and family lawyer Catherine A. Thompson examine how grievance, coercive control and fact chaos can intensify conflict in family-law proceedings.
4 June 2026Checking the AI is not enoughChecking that a source exists can still miss omissions, misread dates and gaps in matter coverage. Here's what stronger verification should test.
29 May 2026Mary now integrates with ActionstepIf Actionstep is your Practice Management System, you can now upload documents straight into the Mary platform.
5 May 2026Cognitive Surrender: A Hidden Risk of AI in LitigationPlausible AI answers can displace independent reasoning under pressure. We examine the risk in litigation and the controls that reduce it.
4 May 2026Custom Chronologies, Bank Statement Analysis and DraftingAn overview of Mary's custom chronologies, bank statement analysis and template-based drafting, with results kept traceable to the underlying evidence.
14 Jan 2026Document Overload? How AI Fact Management Cuts Review TimeHow legal teams can reduce repeat document review by structuring facts, sources and gaps across a litigation matter.
7 Jan 2026What Lawyers Need to Know About AI, and How Not to Use ItA practical guide to task selection, client data, source verification, closed-matter testing and lawyer accountability.- 15 Dec 2025Avoiding the Legal Tech Hype Trap: What to Ask Your VendorA due-diligence checklist for law firms evaluating legal AI vendors, including testing, omissions, source fidelity, security and implementation.
- 8 Dec 2025How Legal Ops Teams Can Drive Tech AdoptionA practical framework for small legal-technology pilots with a defined task, known matter, committed users and measurable results.
- 15 Oct 2025The Complete Guide to Legal Fact ManagementAn introduction to legal fact management and how litigation teams turn scattered documents into a factual record that remains traceable to the evidence.
16 Sept 2025Manual vs AI Chronology Drafting: Time and VerificationA practical comparison of manual and AI-assisted chronology drafting, including source review, omissions and the work lawyers still need to perform.