See where the story changed.
Compare prior testimony with the records around it. Mary lines up every account against the documents, shows where they differ and drafts the questions worth asking.
Every statement a witness made, against the documents.
Interviews, statements and transcripts, lined up with the emails, records and certificates around them.
Every account, in order
- Feb 2025End of SeptemberInterview notes
- Jun 2025ChangedDoesn’t recallDep. Vol. 1, 88:4
- Aug 2025ContradictionOctober 2ndDep. Vol. 2, 142:9
Contradictions, at the page
Pratt testified the order “wasn’t signed until October 2nd” (Dep. 142:9). The DocuSign certificate shows Halvorsen signed at 4:52 PM ET on September 28.
- Pratt_Deposition_Vol2.pdfp. 142
- Halvorsen_DocuSign_Certificate.pdfp. 1
The questions, drafted
- 1. Signing datePut Ex. 7, the DocuSign certificate, Sep 28 4:52 PM.Ex. 7
- 2. Change in accountAsk what he reviewed between Vol. 1 and Vol. 2.Dep. 88:4
- 3. Committee reviewAsk for the minutes JE-1187 relies on.Ex. 23
Rebuild the sequence across every document.
Contracts, board papers, ledgers and correspondence, coded to the issues in the pleadings.
Documents coded to the issues
| Document | Issue | Supports | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dispatch log, depot 2 | Departure time | Plaintiff | Verified |
| Driver statement, J. Ortiz | Departure time | Defendant | Contradiction |
| Email, R. Brennan | Knowledge of defect | Plaintiff | Unverified |
| Maintenance log, Q1 | Knowledge of defect | Unknown | Not produced |
Referenced, but never produced
- Revenue committee minutesCited in JE-1187, Ex. 23Not produced
- Q1 maintenance logCited in Ex. 12, p. 17Not produced
- Board pack, OctoberReferenced in Pratt email, Ex. 9Not produced
See where the story changes in your matter.
30-minute product walkthrough. No obligations.
How Clayton Utz chose its legal AI.
20 of the firm’s lawyers ran a complex litigation matter’s review end to end to set the benchmark. The same matter then went through five leading AI platforms.
Explore how Clayton Utz chose Mary“We needed the tool that could find what others missed, and prove it. Mary was the only platform where our associates felt confident they’d been exhaustive.”
Draft in Copilot or Claude, from the reviewed record.
Letters of advice, case outlines and statements of facts start from what’s verified, contested and missing.
Letter of advice, drafted in ClaudeFrom the recordThe certificate records signature on September 28Ex. 7, p. 1. Mr Pratt now places it on October 2Dep. 142:9, which the documents don’t support. The committee minutes relied on in JE-1187 haven’t been produced and should be soughtEx. 23.
3 citations · 1 fact awaiting review
Drafts land back in the matter, cited and waiting for your team to check.
See integrationsCommercial litigation questions.
Does a contradiction mean the witness lied?
No. It means two sources disagree. Context and other explanations matter, and your team decides what to put to the witness.
Can Mary handle deposition transcripts and exhibits?
Yes. Transcripts are lined up against the documents around them, with each account cited to its volume, page and line, and every exhibit cited to its page.
Does it work with our document management system?
iManage is live, and PMS/DMS integrations are included on every plan.
Is client data used to train AI?
No. Documents, matter content, prompts and outputs are never used to train models.